Amir Milushev vs Gian Gruenig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Milushev has won 41.03% of points on their second serve recently, whereas Gruenig has a slightly better performance, winning 44.63%. Can this difference be crucial for predicting the match outcome? Quite possibly.
• In terms of winning points off opponents’ second serves, Gruenig is ahead, achieving 45.61% compared to Milushev’s 39.29%. This gives Gruenig a potential advantage.
• When returning first serves, Gruenig slightly edges out Milushev with 31.22% over Milushev’s 30%, indicating Gruenig's overall return game may be stronger.
• Milushev has shown resilience under pressure, saving 70% of breakpoints compared to Gruenig’s 50.72%, which is key for tense match moments.
• Over the past year, Gruenig has a better match win percentage, claiming victory in 55.88% of their games compared to Milushev's 47.37%.
• On preferred surfaces, Milushev performs best on hard courts while Gruenig excels on clay, possibly benefiting Gruenig if the match is played on clay.
• Both players have competed mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, yet Gruenig has a higher win percentage of 57.58% compared to Milushev's 47.37%.
• The average ranking of opponents for both players is quite similar, with Milushev playing against slightly higher-ranked opponents.
• Milushev is slightly better in deciding sets with a 40% win rate, which could be pivotal if the match goes the distance.
• Gruenig has shown better efficiency in converting breakpoints recently, with a conversion rate of 40% compared to Milushev’s 28.57%, providing Gruenig a slight tactical edge.

Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):

In the upcoming match, Gruenig appears to hold several advantages over Milushev. Gruenig's superior second serve return stats and slightly better overall performance in match wins suggest a stronger form.

Although Milushev demonstrates good breakpoint saving ability and performs slightly better in deciding sets, Gruenig's efficiency in converting breakpoints and having the edge in return games could prove decisive.

Factoring in all the comparative statistics, Gruenig is likely to emerge as the winner in this matchup, particularly if the match is played on Gruenig's favored clay surface.